Value Transfer to Frugal Hands

With bitcoin wealth is being transferred specifically to savers. This happens because time in the market is the has the biggest impact with exponential returns. Over time your income has less and less impact on how much you can change your bitcoin stack, all that matter is whether you hold onto your bitcoin or not. This is why what might seem like mindless chants of HODL make soo much sense.  

DCA is a great strategy, it moderates the psychological impact of the ups and down, which in turn calms the fear and the ego. It's a great way to get into bitcoin and help bitcoin over time, but it's impact on your stack does reduce over time if your income stays the same in fiat terms. Whats more significant is how you scale your lifestyle in relationship with your new found bitcoin wealth.  If you keep your lifestyle the same, this has a lot of impact allowing you to never sell bitcoin. This 

Not expanding your lifestyle means you never feel the wealth from bitcoin in your physical possessions. and this might be a bit too extreme of frugality for most ( although I do commend these hermits).  You scale your lifestyle at a linear pace lower than 

You can even scale your lifestyle at close to the same pace as bitcoin, exponentially, with bitcoin backed loans. This adds some risk and in the past has lead to loss of bitcoin at organisations such as Celcius and Blockfi, but we may have learnt from the excesses and mistakes of the past and these things seem to be coming back to popularity. Combined with DCA you can reduce risk and bring forward bitcoin returns from your DCA. Jack Mallers explains for his new loan product at Strike, that you can take one years salary out as bitcoin collateralised loan, spend it as you need whilst you continue to work and DCA your whole salary. As long as bitcoin goes up more than the interest charged then you are making a net gain over the year. Given the average return of bitcoin can hold up then the amount that you stack should cover the cost of the loan and then some. when the loan is due to be repaid after one year, you can take out another to cover it with the extra capital that you can gained in the process. This allows for exponential scaling of lifestyle.

Given DCA abilities 

Lifestyle = collateralisable stack x ((average bitcoin return 50%)-(btc collateralised interest rate 14%) x years in the market).

Then ruffly lifestyle compounds rate up to 36% without reducing your stack.

If your more frugal than that then your stack should increase in fiat terms. If your also continuing the DCA then your stack should increase in bitcoin terms.

Of course I wouldn't recommend putting all your stack into this kind of scheme. So your normal stack is more than your collateralisable stack, I would think you might have a ratio of up to 10 to 1. There are risks involved so you minimise them this way and this is not investment advice. Some of these risks come from centralised trust and using only one loan organisation. There are other organisations such as SALT and decentralised loaning systems Debifi and Hodl Hodl Lend. If your getting tired of being a frugal hermit, if your HODL virtue is running dry, they might be worth checking out.

The Hero's Fly Toward the Flame

Popular podcasters have had a good run. The latest OP_RETURN controversy was to juicy to resist. The hits, the downloads, the opportunity to get on the right side of something, the social side. Nver mind that it is a very subtle subject.

I am resisting this, in bitcoin we burn our hero's (or they burn themselves), social controls are diluted through math and privacy and bitcoin doesn't mix well with growing ego's. 

If you are a podcaster (or a blogger) Bitcoin isn't controlled by words, it is controlled by code. If you don't understand the code you have to interpret, and when you interpret you risk projecting yourself onto it and creating confusing hallucinations. For some it is technical, for others it is philosophical, actually it is both, but very subtle. 

If your not contributing to Bitcoin Core then I think that your right to complain is diminished. We need more implementations with more contribution and more users. If you don't like it or think you don't, it's time to get to work. Understand Segwit and Taproot, figure out the difference between node policy and consensus. Let's decentralise the code more, it's a good thing to diversify where the code comes from, it makes bitcoin more resilient. So it's not all bad to have a debate, a so called "war", but whilst I am researching pro's and cons, I'm not signing up to fight. 

Here are some current bitcoin implementations in need of your input.

🔒 Bitcoin Core
• Maintainers: Bitcoin Core developers
• Notes: The reference implementation; conservative and security-focused.

🔧 Bitcoin Knots
• Maintainer: Luke Dashjr
• Notes: A superset of Bitcoin Core with extra features for miners and power users. More experimental and policy-flexible.


🪶 LibreBitcoin
• Maintainer: Community-driven (Librechain project)
• Notes: A drop-in Bitcoin Core fork with hardcoded changes favoring decentralization and transparency (removes assumed trust points).


⚡ btcd
• Language: Go
• Maintainer: btcsuite
• Notes: Full node with a focus on modularity and clean Go code. Used by many in the Lightning ecosystem (e.g., LND).


🦀 Rust Bitcoin / Rust-bitcoind (under development)
• Language: Rust
• Maintainer: rust-bitcoin org
• Notes: Not a full node yet, but increasingly powerful libraries that may form a full implementation in the future.


⚙️ bcoin
• Language: JavaScript/Node.js
• Maintainer: Purse.io
• Notes: Full node and wallet library used for educational and dev-oriented deployments.


🧠 Bitcore
• Language: JavaScript
• Maintainer: BitPay
• Notes: Initially a full node implementation, now mostly focused on wallet infrastructure.

The People Built The Great Pyramids

I find the pyramids fascinating and hypnotic, as I think many people around the world do. It is fun to look at the commonly accepted history and to compare and contrast this with peoples alternate theories. There are so many that i'm not sure the societies consensus still resides with the normal history anymore, at least for the three great pyramids.

One thing that has been found by the science and egyptology community recently was that the masons who built the great pyramids of Giza we not slaves and in fact were some of the best paid and respected people of the city.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-1119792

These findings don't want to believe that the Great Pyramids, the first one of the best quality, were built by slaves. I don't like the idea, given my knowledge of people and economies today it just does not seem realistic. The slaves are not motivated, the army that you need to keep the slaves inline is huge, they have to be paid, they are not actually contributing to the building, you need to do this over generations, someone going to revolt, easily sabotage the project. It is just a huge problem considering where do you get the money and resources from. How you sustain the project to completion after the Pharaoh dies? you need a very intrenched culture to uphold this Pharaoh Hierarchy and we know that maintaining such an order is very difficult. We couldn't build such things now with slaves. We would even struggle if we could find the money to pay people well.

I find it more plausible that they were built by natural agreement of people who had developed an intergenerational low-time preference builder culture. This idea that one unquestionable selfish and self absorbed figure and controlling organisation can cause huge human work efforts. The concept that the team ethic and a long term altruistic perspective are much greater achievers. Examples of cathedrals in recent times compare more favourably to me, where the pyramid projects are considered projects of the society to the benefit many.

Further to this the slave story is a psychological operation designed to trick people into believing that they are better when they are told what to do. It lulls people into accepting slavery and that why the iconography is continued on the the dollar, the sly mechanism they used to bring slavery back. Its a story told by creeps, and whats with the eye?

To continue the metaphor and swap it around with our new money. The bitcoin pyramid, is not evil like the fiat one, it is a beacon signifying the singular powers of decentralised, intergenerational low-time preference builder culture. We might have to build another one to prove it.